-
-
Recent Posts
Blogroll
Recent Comments
- The Importance Of Guess Blogging In Link Building | Article Discovery « Blogging Future on The Importance Of Guess Blogging In Link Building
- ARTICLESFEATUREDIRECT.com on How To Choose Between A National And International Collection Agency
- Eco-Friendly Tips For Your Home Renovation | Article Discovery | Kitchen Cabinets Toronto on Eco-Friendly Tips For Your Home Renovation
- Internet Marketing Solutions For 2010 | Article Discovery | One Click Marketing Labs on Internet Marketing Solutions For 2010
- How To Earn extra CASH $$ Host a Mineral Makeup Party! | Mineralmakeups.org on Bartender Jobs – An Excellent Source of Extra Cash
Meta
Archives
-
Category Archives: politicians
Sleeper Agents From Birth Called Terror Babies
The 14th amendment is under stress right now with the pressure from Texas Republicans who are concerned about the “terror babies” being born to illegal immigrants within the U.S. U.S. citizenship is of course to anyone born in America with the 14th amendment. All of the illegal immigrants coming to America pregnant to have their babies are being paid by taxpayers, says Louie Gohmert, Texas congressman, and Debbie Riddle who is the state representative. Next they become sleeper agents back in their own country and return to the U.S. as adults to attack.
Concerns with terror babies
CNN’s Anderson Cooper talked all about the conspiracy theory about terror babies. All the information on terror babies came from “former FBI officials” according to Republicans in Texas, Riddle and Gohmert. Gohmert wants the 14th amendment to be changed which is why terror babies were brought up. Women from other countries have children in the U.S. “with the nefarious purpose of turning them into little terrorists, who’ll then come back to the U.S. and do us harm,” says Riddle. There is no proof that terror babies really exist as they were being pressed by Cooper. Riddle complained on camera that before the taping nobody warned her that she would have to come up with actual facts during the interview.
U.S. laws make little terrorists unlikely
Think Progress explains that these terror babies are unlikely to exist considering U.S. law. Getting a visa to the U.S. is pretty difficult. An officer at the U.S. embassy has to interview these individuals who will provide evidence of their trip purpose, fingerprints and photos. The purpose within the country is usually to work for those immigrant women who do actually have kids in the U.S. who become American citizens.
Getting citizenship with anchor babies
The terror babies idea is an escalated perversion of the “anchor babies” talking point used by Republican senators who argue the 14th amendment needs to be rewritten to curb automatic “birthright citizenship.” However PolitiFact reports that having an anchor baby won’t put a Mexican or Middle Eastern mom on the fast track to become a U.S. citizen. It will take many more than 30 years to do it. Children aren’t able to sponsor their parents who aren’t citizens unless they’re 21 years old. Parents have to be living in their home for 10 years after getting this sponsor before they’ll be allowed to apply to enter the U.S. again.
Lying with FBI evidence
After Gohmert and Riddle spun their terror babies horror story, CNN’s Cooper interviewed Tom Fuentes, who served as the FBI’s assistant director in the office of international operations from 2004 to 2008. According to Fuentes, there has never been anything on terror babies. Elise Hu of the Texas Tribune made an open-records request for communication between Riddle’s office and previous FBI agents. No such records exist.
Further reading
YouTube
youtube.com/watch?v=jUA7obmYvPk
CNN
cnn.com/2010/OPINION/08/13/navarrette.terror.babies/
Think Progress
thinkprogress.org/2010/08/13/gohmert-terrorists-immigration/
Linda McMahon The Official Republican Candidate For Connecticut Senate Seat
Linda McMahon has just received the nomination from the Republican Party to run for the United States Senate. One of the two seats for Connecticut is being fought for this fall. Linda McMahon is the wife of Vince McMahon Jr., and she is also former WWE Entertainment CEO. Senator Chris Dodd is retiring when his term expires and Linda McMahon stepped down as CEO last year to run for the seat. Article resource – Linda McMahon gets the nod for Connecticut Senate race by Personal Money Store.
Linda McMahon is not running a kayfabe campaign
Linda McMahon is making a big point of principle with her run for office by financing the entire thing herself, with no donations from taxpayer election funds, interest groups, or Political Action Committees whatsoever. She has, according to ABC, spent over $ 22 million from her own pocket and isn’t really deterred by having to spend more up to November. She’s running against Dick Blumenthal, the Connecticut Attorney General since 1991 and previously a member of the Connecticut House of Representatives and Connecticut State Senate.
What is it she stands for?
Linda McMahon is a classic neo-conservative. Fiscally conservative policies, with emphasis on deregulation and job creation, are large parts of her platform. She has come out in support of Obama’s strategy in Afghanistan, but is notably hawkish on Iran. She has broken with mainstream Republicans, having donated money to a pro-choice Republican PAC, though she’s also opposed to partial-birth abortion. In an interview with the Connecticut Mirror, she came out as being warmer to LGBT rights than even the President, calling for the end of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, and for gay marriage to be an issue for the states.
So what is the bottom line?
She is, assuredly, one more famous and wealthy person running for office. It’s not the first time someone has done so, but in fairness her organizational skills as CEO took her company to being almost as popular as NASCAR and is now the only publicly traded pro-wrestling organization. (The McMahons own a large majority of the shares.) She has some policies that are very popular. The question then becomes what are you going to do when Wrestle mania goes to Washington, brother?
More on this topic accessible at these sites
ABC News
abcnews.com/george/2010/08/linda-mcmahon-i-will-spend-what-it-takes.html
CT Mirror
ctmirror.org/story/5215/mcmahons-investment-produces-its-first-returns
Just Exactly Who Was Robert Gibbs Talking About?
After a recent interview, most are scratching their heads after White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs blasted a group of people he dubbed the “professional left.” Though the quote is indicative of the ambience of the Oval Office recently, it makes one pine for the days when the highly quotable Dan Quayle was around. Post resource – Who are these people Robert Gibbs is talking about? by Personal Money Store.
Gibbs doesn’t like the left once they are within the large leagues
The “professional left,” as Press Secretary Robert Gibbs put it, have yet to be satisfied with anything Obama has done as president. He said in an interview with The Hill that they would only be happy with universal health-care like one that Canda has and the abolition of the Pentagon. He also said that they were comparing Obama with George W. Bush, and that for doing this, they should all be “drug tested.” He maintained they would be extremely hard to please “even if Dennis Kucinich was President.”
Who are these sinister people?
He could mean individuals who criticized Obama’s abandoning of a public option and lax policy concerning LGBT issues. Critics also point out little has been done about Don’t Ask Don’t Tell from the White House. Still, just who exactly the “professional left” is supposed to be, it isn’t clearly defined. The day the interview was published, Gibbs was noticeably absent from a White House press conference. Gibbs was reported as being sick, according to Bill Burton who was his temporary replacement.
We’re going to need at least more
Though the exact demographic Robert Gibbs was lampooning was not entirely clear, what it was he objected to was clear. The fact is that no matter what an elected official does, it is never good enough for some individuals, and others just love to complain.
Find more data on this subject at these websites
The Hill
thehill.com/homenews/administration/113431-white-house-unloads-on-professional-left